The exploration of metadiscourse markers of research articles across sciences

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 564

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELLTE02_050

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 آذر 1395

چکیده مقاله:

Metadiscourse is particularly important at advanced levels of academic writing. It is based on a view of writing as a social engagement. This study reports a comparative study of interactive metadiscourse markers in research articles across the disciplines of applied linguistics, medicine, chemistry and behavioral psychology to shed some light on the ways academic writers deploy these resources in a high stakes research genre to persuade readers in their own discourse community. Drawing on Hyland's metadiscourse framework, the study examined the use of five types of interactive metadiscourse, together with their subtypes, in a corpus of ١٠٠ research articles. No statistically significant difference was achieved by functional-contextual analysis in the use of interactive metadiscourse markers across disciplines. The analysis suggested how academic writers use language to offer a credible representation of their work in different fields, and thus how metadiscourse can be seen as a means of uncovering something of the rhetorical and social distinctiveness of disciplinary communities. The findings are attributable to the knowledge-knower structures characteristic of the disciplines and the epistemologies underlying the research paradigms. These findings might have implications for the teaching of academic writing and for novice writers who would like to publish their research in academic journals.

کلیدواژه ها:

Academic writing ، Interactive metadiscourse markers ، Social and Natural Sciences

نویسندگان

Reza Abdi

Associate Professor, ELT Department, Faculty of Humanities, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili

Parisa Ahmadi

ELT Instructor, Payam Noor University, Ardabil Branch & Ph.D. Candidate in TEFL, Urmia University

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Abdi, R., Tavangar Rizi, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The ...
  • Adel, A. (20 06). Metadiscours in L1 and L2 English. ...
  • Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2003). Metadiscourse and ESP reading c omprehension: ...
  • Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical ac. ...
  • Crismore, A. (1990). Metadiscourse and discourse processes: interactions and issues. ...
  • Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in ...
  • Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal ...
  • Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research metlhods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative ...
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms ...
  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: ...
  • Harwood, N. (2005). Nowhere has anyone attempted...In this article I ...
  • Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: Ao introduction to written discourse ...
  • Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. ...
  • Hyland, K. (20 .5). Metadiscourse Eploring interaction in writing. London: ...
  • Hyland, K, & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: ...
  • Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetori. Metatext in Finni sh-English ...
  • Myles, J. (2002) Second language writing and researc. The writing ...
  • Rahman, M. (2004). Aiding the reader: The use of metalinguistic ...
  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: ...
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1998). Language is not a physical object. Journal ...
  • Svalberg, A. M-L. (2007). Language _ and language learning. Language ...
  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English for specific purpose in ...
  • Swales, J. (2001). Metatalk in American Academic Talk. Journal of ...
  • Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue ...
  • Thompson, G., & Thetela, P. (1995). The sound of one ...
  • Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some explanatory discourse On metadiscours. ...
  • Jalilifar, A. R. & Shooshtari, Z. G. (2011). Metadi ScOurSe ...
  • Vande Kopple, W. J. (2002). Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in ...
  • 13). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع