The EFFECTS OF SYMMETRICAL AND ASYMMETRICAL SCAFFOLDING ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’GRAMMAR INSTRUCTION

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 551

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF03_093

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 اردیبهشت 1395

چکیده مقاله:

This study investigated the extent to which two types of scaffolding, namely Symmetrical and/or Asymmetrical Scaffolding could contribute to the acquisition of grammar among Iranian EFL sophomores. To fulfill this objective, 42 female college students who aged between 19 and 24 were selected through convenience sampling and, after taking a pretest, divided into two groups of: Symmetrical scaffolding (SS), Asymmetrical scaffolding (AS). The experimental group AS received instruction according to asymmetric strategy while the experimental group SS was instructed via the symmetric strategy. To answer the research questions a post-test was conducted, and its results were analyzed using independent and paired t-test. The results showed that AS scaffolding is a more fruitful strategy in improving participant's grammar achievement. The results could have some implications for instructors and teachers regarding how to help each other in the process of learning

نویسندگان

Mohamadreza Farangi

PhD, TEFL, Shiraz University, Shiraz

Amirreza Houshmand

BA, TEFL, Bojnord Farhangian University,Imam Mohamad Baqer Center, Bojnord

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Barnard R. & Campbell, L. (2005). Sociocultural theory and the ...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of ...
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • Fotos, A.. (2001). Cognitive approaches to grammar instruction. In M. ...
  • Garton, A. F. (1992). Social interaction and the development of ...
  • Nassaji, H., & Cumming, A. (2000). What's in a ZPD? ...
  • Granott, N. (1993). Patterns of interaction in the co-construction of ...
  • Daniels H. (2005). An Introduction to Vygotsky (2nd ed.). London: ...
  • Piaget, J. (1960). The psychology of intelligence. Littlefields: Adams & ...
  • Walque, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: a ...
  • Dahms, M., Geonnotti, K., Passalacqua, D., Schilk, J. N., Wetzel, ...
  • Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. ...
  • Storch N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. ...
  • Damon W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three ...
  • Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In ...
  • Pishghadam R. &S. Ghardiri. 201! Symmetrical _ asymmetrical scaffolding: Piagetian ...
  • Maftoon, P. & Ghafoori, G. (2009). A comparative study of ...
  • Baleghizadeh, Timcheh Memar, and Memar (2010) ...
  • Veeramuthu, _ (2011). The effect of scaffolding technique in journal ...
  • Kim, Y. & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor ...
  • Bryan and Christianson (2008) ...
  • Lee, L. (2008). Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert- to-novice ...
  • Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and ...
  • Skehan, P. (2003). Focus on form, task and technology. Computer ...
  • jolle/201 1_ 1 /pi S hg hadam_ghadiri .pdf ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع