A Contrastive Analysis of Metonymy in English and Farsi: Elaborating on the Implications for ELT

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 1,396

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF و WORD قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELTL02_009

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 اسفند 1394

چکیده مقاله:

This descriptive study examines the figurative language and its characteristics and specifications in Farsi and English as corpus study in form of a contrastive analysis on metonymy in English versus Farsi based on semantics. To compare and analyze the metonymies found in English and Persian corpora, two models are employed which have a lot in common. One model is by Safavi (2008) and the other belongs to I. Saeed (2008).These two models were originally introduced by Lakoff and Johnson (1978).Based on these models. The researcher adopted a modified version in which 25 types of metonymy were identified to be applied to English and Persian instances of metonymy. According to this modified version, an attempt was made to classify each instance in both languages basedon this model in this study. As a result 215 metonymic expressions were identified from two books and their authentic translations in Farsi. Findings showed that out of 215 metonymic cases 172 of them were metonymic in Farsi while 99 of them were metonymic in English. Only 23 cases were matched and 7 matched metonymies were found as a proposed model for Persian learners of English.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Ali Dousti

MA in English Teaching, Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran

Habib Gowhari

Associate Professor, Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Amouzadeh, M., Tavangar, M., &Sorahi, M., A. (2012), A cognitive ...
  • from: http:/www. sciencedirec. com/science% rticlepi/S1 8 7704281 2000365 ...
  • Baldick, C. (2001). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. ...
  • Cuddon, J.A. (2013). A dictionary of literature terms and literary ...
  • CAMPO, J. (2007). Discourse, Semantics and Metonymy, UNIVERSITA T JAUME ...
  • Diven, R., &Porings, R. (2002), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison ...
  • Guan, J. (2009). The Cognitive Nature of Metonymy and Its ...
  • Kriskovic, A., Tominac S. (2009). Metonymy based On cultural background ...
  • Lakoff, G., (1987).Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal ...
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003) .Metaphors we live by. ...
  • Nabifar, N. (2013).A comparative study of English and Persian proverbs ...
  • Panther, K., &Thornburg, L. (2003), Introduction: Metonymy across languages. Jezikoslovlje. ...
  • ParkerJoshua, A. (2007).Book Review II: Women, Fire, and Dangerous , ...
  • Saeed J., I. (2003) .Semantics, Third Edition New Jersey: Wiley ...
  • Safavi, K. (2009) .An introduction to Semantics. Tehran: Adineh book ...
  • Warren, B. (2006). Referential Metonymy, ScriptaMinora. Sweden:Royal Society of Letters ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع