Sit-to-Stand or Stand-to-Sit: Which Movement Can Classify Better Parkinsonian Patients From HealthyElderly Subjects?

سال انتشار: 1390
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 676

فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICBME18_068

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 27 فروردین 1393

چکیده مقاله:

In this paper, we proposed Approximate Entropy (ApEn) measure for nonlinear analysis of patterns of two dailycommon movements, that is sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit, in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) using deep brain stimulation (DBS). ApEn value of a signal indicates its complexity and irregularity, such that larger the ApEn measure is, more stochastic and less regular the signal is. Here, this nonlinear measure is used for classifying three groups of 1) healthy subjects, 2) PD patients with DBS off, and 3) the same PD patients with DBS on, based on their sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit patterns. To this end, the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots (AUC) is used to evaluate the capability of ApEn. For stand-to-sit patterns and for discrimination between two groups of normal vs. PD with DBS off, normal vs. PD with DBS on, and PD with DBS off vs. PD with DBS on, we achieved the AUC values of up to 0.9625, 0.9, and 0.9583, respectively. Also, there was high correlation betweenApEn values of PD patients obtained from different sensors and the severity of their Parkinson’s disease i.e. UPDRS scores (up to 0.7671 for PD with DBS off and 0.774 for PD with DBS on). For sit-to-stand patterns and to distinguish between normal vs. PD with DBS off, normal vs. PD with DBS on, and PD with DBS off vs. PD with DBS on, we achieved the AUC values of up to 1, 0.9778, and 0.9167, respectively. Moreover, for this pattern, therewas higher correlation between ApEn values of PD patients and their UPDRS scores (up to 0.9573 for PD with DBS off and 0.7145 for PD with DBS on). Furthermore, in both sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit patterns, it was observed that PD patients have larger complexity values than healthy controls and PD subjects in DBS on state had smaller irregularity values than PD subjects in DBS off state. In general, we may conclude that sit-to-stand patterns can distinguish PD patients from healthy subjects and also be used to estimate the severity of Parkinson’s disease better thanstand-to-sit patterns.

نویسندگان

Y Rakhshani Fatmehsari

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

F Bahrami

CIPCE, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • the sit-to-stand movement: a review', Physical Therapy, vol. 82, no. ...
  • L. M. Inkster, and J. J. Eng, ":Postural control during ...
  • M. K. Y. Mak, and C. W. Y Hui-Chan, _ ...
  • M. Roerdink, P. Hlavackova, and N. Vuillerme, "Center-of-pre Ssure regularity ...
  • A. Weiss, T. Herman, M. Plotnik, M. Brozgol, I Maidan, ...
  • Y. Rakhshani, F. Bahrami, "Assessment of Parkinsons disease: _ _ ...
  • _ _ _ #"" processing:, IEEE Press Seris ...
  • PD with DBS off 0.51 16 ).5743 -0.2093 0.1521 -0.6233 ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع