Teaching English Polysemous Words to Iranian EFL Learners: Underlying Meaning Approach and Sense Selection in Comparison

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 472

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELLTE02_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 آذر 1395

چکیده مقاله:

The primary goal of this experimental research was to replicate Nakahara's (2005) experiment on Iranian learners' acquisition of polysemous word, and to see whether the underlying meaning approach is an effective strategy to teach polysemous words to low proficiency learners or not. The participants were 46 female first grade students with the age range of 14 to 15 studying in two intact classes of the same high school instructed by the same teacher (researcher). To achieve the research objective, the participants were taught 40 polysemous words using two distinct approaches: one traditional sense selection approach, and the other more modern reference specification approach through the presentation of the underlying meaning. To analyze the collected data, t- test was used. Results of the analysis indicated that the application of underlying meaning approach was more beneficial to Iranian learners than the traditional alternative; that is sense selection approach. The study ends with the pedagogical implications of this principled approach for teaching polysemous words that both EFL teachers in teaching and learners in learning have difficultywith.

نویسندگان

Mohammad Piri Ardakani

Department of English Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran

Anita Lashkarian

Department of English, Maybod Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maybod, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Aitchison, J. (1994). Words in the mind: An introduction to ...
  • Bandi-Rao, S., & Murphy, G.L. (20 07). The role of ...
  • Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awarenes and vocabulary retention. Applied linguistics, ...
  • Carter, R & Nunan, D. (20 01). Teaching English to ...
  • Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. UK: Cambridge ...
  • Cruse, A. (20 00). Meaning in language: an introduction to ...
  • Dufour, R.. Kroll, J.F. (1995). Matching words to concepts in ...
  • Durkin, K., & Manning, J. (1989). Polysemy and the subjective ...
  • Falkum, I.L. (2011). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polysemy: A ...
  • Firth. J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-1955. ...
  • Freeman Baker, C. (1999). Seeing clearly: Frame semantics, psycholing uistics, ...
  • Geeraerts, D. (1955).Words and other wonder, papers on lexical and ...
  • Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language ...
  • Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representation ...
  • Klepousniotou, E. (2001). The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع