The Interplay of Learning Approaches and Preferences for Methods of Assessment of Iranian EFL Learners in academic Context

سال انتشار: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 519

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF02_101

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 بهمن 1394

چکیده مقاله:

The present study aimed at making inquiries about the relationships between Iranian EFL students’ learning approaches, and their preferences for different modes of assessment. A sample of one hundred and ten junior and senior EFL students majoring in English Translation and English Literature at Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, participated in this study. Participants were both male and female. In order to gather required data, two questionnaires were used: The Revised two factors Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) by Biggs et al. (2001), Assessment Preferences Inventory (API) by Birenbaum (1994). As the results showed; first, deep learning approach had significant positive relationships with both summative and formative assessments; second, surface learning approach had significant positive relationship with summative method of assessment.

کلیدواژه ها:

Learning approaches ، Deep and Surface learning approaches ، Assessment preferences ، Summative and Formative assessment

نویسندگان

Mina Rastegar

Ph.D TEFL,Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

Arezo Golestanian

M.A. TEFL,Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ary, D., Jacob, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (1972). Introduction ...
  • Biggs, J.B. (1999). Assessing Student Approaches _ Learning. Australian Psychologist, ...
  • Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, Y. P. (2001). ...
  • Birenbaum, M. (1997). Assessment Preferences and their Relationship to Learning ...
  • Choy, F, O'Grady, G, & Rotgans, I. (2012).Is the Study ...
  • Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. ...
  • Davies, A, & Le Mahieu, P. (2003). Assessment for Learning: ...
  • Dochy, F. and Mc-Dowell, L. (1997). Assessment as a Tool ...
  • Dogan, _ Atmaca, N., & Yolcu, S. (2012). The Correlation ...
  • Gibbs, G. (1999). Using Assessment Strategically to Change the Way ...
  • Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Dierick, S. (2003). Evaluating the ...
  • Gijbelsa, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & Van ...
  • Gijbelsa, D. & Dochy, F. (2006). Students" Assessment Preferences and ...
  • Kember, D. (1996). The Intention to both Memorise and Understand: ...
  • Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in ...
  • Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1997). Approaches to Learning: The ...
  • Nijhuis, J. F. H., Segers, M. S. R. & Gijselaers, ...
  • Ramsden, P. (1979). Student Learning and Perceptions of the Academic ...
  • Entwistle, N. J. & Entwistle, A. C. (1991). Contrasting Forms ...
  • Ramsden, P., and Entwistle, N.J. (1981). Effects of Academic Departments ...
  • Scouller, K. (1998). The Influence of Assessmet Method on Students' ...
  • Segers, M., Fan, X., Thomson, B., & Wang, L. (2006). ...
  • Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2006). Students" Perceptions ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع