A Comparative Study of Textual and Visual Contextualization on Iranian EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 586

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF03_223

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 اردیبهشت 1395

چکیده مقاله:

Language teaching practitioners are currently putting increasing emphasis on L2 vocabulary learning in the language teaching curriculum. Additionally, with the emergence and prevalence of growing technologies, language teachers are assumed to take advantage of these technologies in prompting L2 learning vocabulary. The present comparative study investigates the effect of using two types of vocabulary contextualization; textual and visual, in teaching vocabulary. The participants were seventy learners in pre intermediate level of L2 proficiency ranging in age from 14 to 30. On the basis of a Cambridge Placement Test of Vocabulary, they were selected and divided into two groups of 35, namely group 1 and group 2. The lexical items were taught to group 1 and group 2 through showing videos and written texts respectively. Results of t-test showed that the learners who learned the vocabulary items through visual contextualization manifested more vocabulary acquisition than those who received vocabulary instruction through reading written texts. It can be concluded that visual contextualization can aid language learners more in vocabulary acquisition than textual contextualization.

نویسندگان

Mehdi Mirzaei

Islamic Azad University, Khodabandeh Branch

Masoud Zoghi

Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. Retrieved March ...
  • Anderson, R.C., & Nagy, W.E. (1991). Word meanings. In R. ...
  • Arkan, A., & Taraf, H. U. (2010). C ontextualizing Young ...
  • Beck, I., & McKeowen, M. (1991). Condlitions of vocabulary acquisition. ...
  • Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading ...
  • Chapple, L., & Curtis, A. (2002). Content based instruction in ...
  • Finkbeiner, M. & Nicol, J. (2003). Semantic category effects in ...
  • Grignon, P. M. Lavaur, J & Blanc, N. (2005). The ...
  • Hatch, E.., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language ...
  • Mishan, F. (2005).Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Portland: Intelect ...
  • Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. ...
  • Nation, P. (207). Fundamental issues in modelling and assessing vocabulary ...
  • Daller, J. Milton & J. Treffers -Daller, (Eds.), Modelling and ...
  • Paivio, A. Imagery and cognitive process. New York: Holt, Rinehart ...
  • Pigada, M. & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive ...
  • Read, J. (2004). Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of ...
  • Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct ...
  • Reese, S. D., & W. R. Davie. (1987). Captioning effects ...
  • Sadeghi, K., & Farzizadeh, B. (2013). The Effect of Vi ...
  • Schoonen, R. (2011). How language ability is assessed. In E. ...
  • Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the ...
  • Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies ...
  • Stahl, S. A. & Nagy, W. E. (2006). Teaching Word ...
  • Uckun, B. (2008). How does context contribute to EFL learners ...
  • White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical enhanced ...
  • Webb, S. (208). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary ...
  • Zarei, A. (2009). The effect of bimodal, standard, and reversed ...
  • Zhang, Y, Wu, L, Wei, & Wang, S, L. (2011). ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع