A Comparative Study of Metacognitive Strategies in One-way vs. Two-way Speaking Tasks among Iranian EFL Learners

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 456

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF و WORD قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF04_200

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 خرداد 1396

چکیده مقاله:

This study was an attempt to investigate the effect of metacognitive strategies (MS) on speaking ability of the learners and also what MS are specifically employed by learners when it comes to different task types. Sixtyfemale students at advanced level were randomly selected and given an OPT to make sure of their homogeneity.They were assigned to experimental and control groups. The MS questionnaire was also administered to seewhat MS they employed in speaking tasks. The control group was traditionally taught to practice speaking tasks in a conventional way. The experimental group, however, practiced one-way and two-way speaking tasks afterreceiving MS instruction. After administering the posttest, an ANCOVA comparison of the mean ratings of thetwo groups on the posttest test revealed a significant difference between the speaking ability and MS use of the two groups. The results indicated that the experimental group outperformed the control group, leading to the conclusion that instruction in MS use prior to oral tasks had a significantly higher impact on EFL leaners’ speaking ability. Statistically, the results obtained from descriptive statistics and the chi-square revealed that the difference between MS employed by participants in one-way speaking tasks versus two-way speaking tasks were significant

نویسندگان

Faranak Sodagari

M.A. Department of English Language, Faculty of Science and Research, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj , Iran

Adel Dastgoshadeh

Ph.D Department of English, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Brown, C., & Yule, C. (1983). Teaching the spoken language: ...
  • Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a ...
  • Cohen, A. D. (2004). Strategy-based learning of speech acts: Developing ...
  • Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). "Information gap" tasks: do ...
  • Quarterly, 20, 305-325. Retrieved from: January, 17, 2016, ...
  • Eckard, R., & Kearny, M. (1981). Teaching conversationl skills in ...
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new ...
  • Florez, M. A. C. (1999). Improving Adult English Language Learners'; ...
  • Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective On the negotiation of ...
  • Guo, Y. (2011). Communic ative learning in teaching materials: A ...
  • Howarth, P. (2001). Process speaking. Preparing to repeat yourself. MET, ...
  • Lam, Y. K. W. (2009). Examining the effects of metacognitive ...
  • Lv, F., & Chen, H. (2010). A study of metacognitive- ...
  • McDonough, J. & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and Methods in ...
  • Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicativ classroom. New ...
  • OMalley, J. M. (1987). The effect of training in the ...
  • O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies ...
  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies. Boston: Heinle & ...
  • Rahimi, M, & Katal, M. (2013). The impact of metacognitive ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع