Relationship between Perception of Professional Ethics with Social Responsibility and employees’ productivity

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 484

فایل این مقاله در 13 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

FACONF01_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 مرداد 1396

چکیده مقاله:

This study aimed to determine the relationship of professional ethics perception with social responsibility and employees’ productivity in the General Directorate of Roads and Urban Development in Isfahan. It was a descriptive and correlational study. The study population included all employees of the Department of Roads and Urban Development in Isfahan who were 388 people. Among them 193 employees were selected as sample using Cochran sample size formula and stratified random sampling proportional to size. Data collection tools included three questionnaires; professional ethics questionnaire (Kadozir, 2002) with 14 items, productivity questionnaire (Hersey, Blanchard & Goldsmith, 1980) with 26 items and a social responsibility questionnaire (Gylbers, 2010) with 19 items based on 5 Likert scale. Validity of the questionnaires was confirmed using the comments of supervisor and some members of the population. The coefficient of reliability of three questionnaires was estimated using Cronbach s alpha coefficient, respectively (0.80), (0.90) and (0.82). In order to analyze data, descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics including Pearson correlation coefficient, multiple regression and multi-way ANOVA tests were used. Results showed that there is a significant relationship between professional ethics and its aspects with social responsibility (p<0.01, r=0.502) and also between professional ethics and its aspects with productivity (p<0.01, r=602). Stepwise regression analyses showed that among aspects of professional ethics in the first step competitiveness and striving for superiority and in the second step justice and fairness are the best predictors of productivity and social responsibility. In respondents views there was a significant difference in professional ethics based on degree of education and work experience. However, based on demographic factors there was no significant difference in productivity and social responsibility.

نویسندگان

Jalal Jafri Kangarlouei

Department of Industrial Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Mohammad Mirmohammadi Sadrabadi

Department of Accounting, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran

Fereshteh Asadollahian

Department of Industrial Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Hamed Shakerian

Department of Industrial Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Alen L. 2002. Ethical management in public services, Translation: Mohammad ...
  • Alvani Seyed M, Ghasemi Seyed A. 1998. Management and social ...
  • Anderson, Saffana &amp; Samuel, P.D. Anantadjaya (1988), Csr &amp; Performance: ...
  • Arianpour Kashani, M. 2006. Arianpour c omprehensive dictionary, Tehran, Jahan ...
  • Bakli, R.K., Neena, Sinha &amp; Archana, Singh (2001). An analysis ...
  • Taheri Sh. 2001. Productivity and its analysis in organizations. Second ...
  • Jazani J. 2003. Business ethics and marketing in Islamic economics, ...
  • Jex. 1976. Ethics philosophy: practical wisdom, Translation: Abolghasem Pourhosseini. Tehran, ...
  • Khalili Araghi M, Yaghinlou M. 2005. Highlights of companies social ...
  • Mirsepasi N. 2007. Human resource management and labor relations: Strategic ...
  • Mousavi S A. 1998. Effective factors in productivity of universities, ...
  • Niaz Azari K, Barimani A, Haji Gholikhani B. 2012. The ...
  • O stadzadeh M. 2012. Effective factors in increase Or decrease ...
  • Rabinz A. 2002. _ rganizational behavior, Translation: Mahdi Zare, Nasr ...
  • Rahman Seresht H, Rafiee M, Kousha M. 2001. Social responsibility; ...
  • Rezaiee A. 2003. Organizations management and productivity of manpower. Tadbir, ...
  • Rezaieeyan. 2003. Advanced organizational behavior management. Samt publication. First edition. ...
  • Sokaran A. 2002. Research methods in management. Translation: Saebi, M, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع