Maximizing the Potential of Intermediate EFL Learners' Formal Style of the WrittenLanguage through Dialogic Interaction

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 699

فایل این مقاله در 15 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

IBSCONF02_151

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 آبان 1395

چکیده مقاله:

As a fundamental notion at the heart of dynamic assessment (DA),dialogic interaction derives from Vygotsky’s (1987) socioculturaltheory with the insight that appropriate use of mediation bloomslearners’ emerging capabilities and enables them to perform beyondtheir current level of developed abilities. The presentation of attunedmediations to the learners need through instructional dialogicinteraction provides mediators with an opportunity to assess thelearners’ current zone of actual development (ZAD) and assist them todevelop new capabilities for reaching independency into a new ZAD.The theoretical understanding of the present study involved the coconstruction of the formal written language from Vygotsky's (1978)instructional implication. Drawing on sociocultural perspective, thiscase study scrutinized the dialogic interaction of Poehner's (2008)interactionist format of DA based on Aljaafreh and Lantolf's (1994)hierarchical (implicit to explicit) presentation of mediations. Thepresent paper focused on the interaction between the learner and theteacher for optimizing the formal style of writing. Dyadic interactioncontributed to guide learners walk through the problem and to enhancelearning through the interaction. The impetus for the study came fromworking with intermediate colloquial and inaccurate writers. Exploitingthe collaborative dialogue with the learners was a follow-up to thelearners' self-awareness in the stilted style of writing. Following asociocultural perspective, this study revealed the fact that how muchteacher-student communication stretched the learners' potential level ofcompetence in writing formally. This case study is in line withSternberg and Grigorenko's (2002) interactionist approach in order toenhance the learners' Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in theformal written language. The analysis of the interaction demonstratedthat formal writing development took place as a result of responding tothe learners' individual needs through dialogic interaction with theteacher.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Iman Bakhoda

MA Student at Allameh Mohaddes Nouri University

Mina Babaee

MA Student at Allameh Mohaddes Nouri University

Karim Shabani

Assistant Professor at Allameh Mohaddes Nouri University

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Aljafreh, A. &Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Negative feedback as Regulation and ...
  • Allison, D. (1998). Investigating learners" course diaries as explorations oflanguage. ...
  • Bauman, R and Sherzer, J. (1974). Explorations in the Ethnography ...
  • Bednar, J. A. (2014). http :/homepages , inf. ed , ...
  • B lanche-B enveniste, C. (1991). Le francaisparle. Etudes grammaticales. Editions ...
  • Bloch, M. (1975). Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society. ...
  • Cambridge Dictionaries Online (1999). http :/dictionary. cambridge , _ rg/grammar/br ...
  • Chi, AML. (2010). Applying Formal Vocabulary toAcademic Writing: Is the ...
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods ...
  • Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University ...
  • Friedrich, P. (1972). Social Context and :Semantic Feature: The Russian ...
  • Gossen, G. (1974). To Speak with a Heated Heart Chamula ...
  • Hammersley, M. (1979). Analysing ethnographic data. Unit 1, Block 6, ...
  • Haywood, K C., Brown, A L, &Wingenfield, S. (1990). Dynamic ...
  • Heylighen, F. (1993). Selection Criteria for the Evolution of Knowledge, ...
  • Heylighen F. andDewaele J-M. (1998). Formality of Language: definition, measuremet ...
  • Lantolf, J.P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second Language development. Oxford: ...
  • Mendis, D. (2010). Formality in academic writing: the use/non-use of ...
  • Miles, M. and Huberman, M.A. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis (second ...
  • Peyton, J.K. and Staton, J. (1993). Dialogue journals in the ...
  • Shaw, P. and Liu, E. T.-K. (1998). What Develops in ...
  • Sternberg, R.J. &Grigorenko, E.L. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع