Comparison analysis of students educational development included in descriptive evaluation with conventional evaluation layout in sixth grade of elementary school in Piranshahr City

سال انتشار: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 663

فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICMM02_277

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 شهریور 1394

چکیده مقاله:

The object of this study is the comparison analysis of students educational development included in qualified evaluation with conventional evaluation layout in sixth grade of elementary school in Piranshahr City. This research approach is a descriptive type. In order to choose candidates, Sampling was done randomly. 40 persons from descriptive group and 40 persons from control group were chosen. In this research tests consist of (1) educational development test in experimental science to evaluate students cognitive characteristics; (2) educational development test in experimental science to evaluate students mental- physical characteristics and (3) life quality questionnaire in Inely and Bourge school to evaluate emotional characteristics was used. The permanency of this questionnaire was achieved by performing an experiment on the sample consist of 30 persons by use of SPSS software with calculating the Kronbakhα coefficient for school life quality questionnaire which is 0.79 and for educational development which is 0.81. To discuss the main hypothesis of this research, we used t-test for both independent group and K-S test for verifying the normalization of data and t-test for assessment of the amount of variables in sample. Results indicate students included in descriptive evaluation have better function in cognitive and functional science test and the amount of emotional characteristics in both groups are the same.

نویسندگان

Masod soleymanzad

Master of Science in Educational Research, Tehran, Iran

Mozaffar Sharifzadeh

Department of Educational Sciences of Payame Noor University,Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Management Challenges and Solutiorns Shiraz, Irarn/ 2015 شیراز 1393 ...
  • Management Challenges and Solutiorns Shiraz, Irarn/ 2015 شیراز 1393 ...
  • Sepasi Hussein. (1382). Effect Evaluation of Educationl Achievement in third ...
  • Hassani, Mohammad. And Ahmadi, Ali. (1386). Kyfy- descriptive survey for ...
  • National Center for International Studies and PIRLS Thames. (1387). Analysis ...
  • Zahra Salehi (1389) "Effects of self-descriptive evaluation of progress and ...
  • Saif Ali Akbar. (1387). Measurement, assesment, evaluation of training, Third ...
  • Bloom, Hstyngz, Madavs, (1355) Guide formative evaluations of the overall ...
  • Rosie, J. (1389). Descriptive evaluation of the impact of academic ...
  • Black, P. J. &Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. ...
  • Mok, M. & Flynn, M. (2002) determinants of students Quality ...
  • Paulson, F. L., & Paulson, P. P. (1994). Student led ...
  • Wu, Y., & Tsai, C. (2005). Development of elementary school ...
  • Young, E. A. (2000). Enhancing student writing by teaching self- ...
  • Fontana, D., & Fernandez, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance ...
  • Fuchs, _ Fuchs, D., Karnes, _ Hanlett, C., &Katzaroff, M. ...
  • Grace, C. (1992). The portfolio and its use: Developmen tally ...
  • McGee, S.J. (1996). The effect of goal setting and attributional ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع