ارزیابی حساسیت تشخیصی آزمون های رایت، کومبس رایت و 2 مرکاپتواتانول در تشخیص بروسلوز

سال انتشار: 1392
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 364

فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_EBCJ-2-4_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 مهر 1398

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Brucellosis is one of the important zoonotic diseases with variety of symptoms and signs. Using of cost effective, easy and safe diagnostic methods in screening of brucellosis is an important priority. Several studies have been carried out to recognize appropriate diagnostic methods and each have reported different results. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity of Wright, Coombs Wright and 2-Mercapto Ethanol tests in diagnosis of brucellosis. Method: In these cross-sectional study 340 diagnosed inpatient cases of brucellosis from Hasheminegad Hospital, Mashhad was included in 2008. Demographic characteristics, clinical signs and laboratory results of subjects were collected.  Data analysis was done by SPSS11.5 and diagnostic sensitivity of Wright, Coombs Wright and 2-Mercapto Ethanol were assessed. Results: Results showed that %54 of participants was male and %58 was in 20-40years old age group. The most common symptoms were fever (%34) and arthralgy (%22).Among patients there were 324 positive Coombs Wright test and 318 positive 2ME test. The sensitivity of Wright test was 92% (CI%95=83-95) and 80.6% (CI%95=76.6-85.1) according to the basis 1:80 and 1:160. Sensitivity of Coombs Wright and 2ME tests were 95.3% (CI%95=91.3-97.7) and 93.7% (CI%95=91.1-95.6), respectively. Conclusion: To diagnose brucellosis Wright, Coombs Wright and 2ME tests, which are commonly used in Iran, are effective tests compared with other new and expensive diagnostic tests.

نویسندگان

Majidreza Erfanian

Associate professor, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Seyed Mohsen Seyyed Nouzadi

Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Lida Jarahi

Assistant professor, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Mantur B.G, Amarnath S.K. Brucellosis in India – a review; ...
  • Refai  M. Incidence and control of brucellosis in the Near ...
  • Sirmatel F, tarker M, Bozkurt A. Evaluation of methods used ...
  • Mantur B.G, Amarnath S.K, Shinde R.S.  Review of clinical and ...
  • Aliskan H. The value of culture and serological methods in ...
  • Hajia M, Rahbar M, Hosseini Taghavi A. Brucellosis Antibody Level ...
  • Agasthya AS, Isloor S, Prabhudas K. Evaluation of brucella indirect ...
  • Memish Z.A, Almuneef M, Mah M.W, Qassem L.A, Osoba A.O. ...
  • Raptis L. Pappas G. Akritidis N. A cutaneous cyst caused ...
  • Gotuzzo  E, Carillo C, Guerra J, Llosa L. An evaluation ...
  • Mert A, Ozaras R, Tabak F. The sensitivity and specificity ...
  • Momen Heravi M, Afzali H. Clinical manifestations of brucellosis in ...
  • Mohraz M, Kariminia A, Sarafnejad AF. The Evaluation of Serologic ...
  • Vakili Z, Momen Heravi M, Sharif A, Masoomi M. Sensitivity ...
  • Ghilian R, Hekmati Moghaddam S.H , Fatemi A, Eslamieh H, Dargahi M. Seroepidemiologic ...
  • in Yazd, 2009. Sci J Iranian Blood Transfus Org. 2011; ...
  • Sirmatel F, Turker M, Bozkurt A.I. Evaluation of the methods ...
  • PeeriDogaheh H,Arzanlou M, Hosseini S, Habibi N.Determination of sensitivity and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع