The Position of University Classification in Iran and International Arena; A Systematic Review

سال انتشار: 1391
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 295

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_FMEJ-2-3_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 مهر 1398

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Providing an appropriate background is essential for necessary changes and innovation in the higher education, the need to review the classification criteria and development of the type of native criteria and local standards which match the cultural and scientific requirements of the country. Investigating the possible types of indicators to adjusted accurately and objectively is important to be effective. Methods: In this systematic review we used 10 primary keywords to study the existing documents and links to related databases in the period of 2000-2011.were studied and classified information with international universities in the structure collection and content analysis was carried out during the process. Results: In this study of the original documentary (3954), 19 articles were found completely relevant to the topic. These articles points to four domains such as; influential presence of the international arena, the improvement of higher educational system and research centered. Conventional university classification is solely in Iran but there are some similarities between the frameworks in China and the United States. For example the Carnegie Classification of colleges and universities in the United States and the Chinese university in 2000 introduced two groups; Pole key universities and other universities. The comparison and assessment of the performance of universities in the international arena must be considered important. Conclusions: The university classification process should clarify university management, extent and scope of work, university influence over the country, and the role of university in long-term goals of the country. If we accept it, we will be able to set it up with a better and more efficiently. Therefore we need to define indicators of functional types as  transparent, scientific and consistent with the native culture and new combinations in universities. It is necessary to combine the international indices with the combination of native priorities.

نویسندگان

Masoumeh Nazari Chamak

Student Research Assembly, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Ali Akbar Haghdoost

School of Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Tahereh Islaminejad

Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • The Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution, Vice President for Science ...
  • Hasani M. A model for promoting innovation in the educational ...
  • University types. 2010. Available from: http://behdasht.gov.ir/index.aspx. ...
  • Hagh Doost AA. Systematic review meta- analysis concepts and applications. ...
  • University in China. 2004-2012. China Education Center Ltd. Available from: ...
  • China University Internationalization Ranking. 2010. Available from: http://www.arwu.org/Country2010Main.jsp param=China. ...
  • McCormick AC, Mei CZ. Rethinking and reframing the Carengie classification. ...
  • Driscoll A. Carengie ‘S community engagement classification: Intentions and insights. ...
  • Tinney J, Strenge R. New Carnegie classification places WSU in ...
  • Toyoshima M. International strategies of universities in England. London Review ...
  • Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Hoxby C, Mas-Colell A, Sapir A. ...
  • Yonezawa A. Japanese flagship universities at a crossroads. Higher Education. ...
  • Fang G, LI J. Seeking excellence in the move to ...
  • Mok KH. Emerging regulatory regionalism in university governance: A comparative ...
  • Kim KS. A Great leap forward to excellence in research ...
  • Hazelkorn E. Rankings and the global Battle for Talent . ...
  • Ho C. China s higher education excellence in the context ...
  • Hsing Chen S. The application of balanced scorecard in the ...
  • Cheng Y, Cai liu N. Academic ranking of world universities ...
  • Cheng Y, Cai liu N. Academic ranking of world universities ...
  • Lukman R, Krajnc D, Glavic P. University ranking using research, ...
  • Marginson S. Globalization, national development and university rankings. Centre for ...
  • Kalvemark T. University ranking systems: A critique. Proceeding of the ...
  • Dill DD, editor. Convergence and diversity: The role and influence ...
  • Dill DD, Soo M. Academic quality, league tables, and public ...
  • Hazelkorn E. ‘Institutional Mission vs. Policy constraint unlocking potential’. Higher ...
  • A map of health science. Ministry of Health and Medical ...
  • Strategy document-advancing the Manchester 2015 agenda. Available from: http://www.manchester.ac.uk/aboutus/facts/vision/2015document/ ...
  • The University strategy and supporting strategies. Cardiff University Strategy-2009/10 to ...
  • The University s mission and core values: Notice. 2001. Available ...
  • Abbasi Moghaddam MA, Razavi SM, Nouraei SM. The attitude of ...
  • Process of Scholarship of Teaching Has Been Successful in Mashad University of Medial Sciences [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • نمایش کامل مراجع