Comparison of in vitro and in situ techniques for estimating protein degradability of selected feedstuffs

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 333

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_KLST-4-1_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 12 خرداد 1398

چکیده مقاله:

The objective of this study was to estimate the protein degradability parameters of 6 common ruminant feedstuff using the nylon bags (in situ) and the innovative in vitro method-the DaisyII incubator. Significant differences were observed between the in situ and in vitro methods in estimation of the rapidly soluble (a) fraction (Pin vitro method were highly correlated with the estimated values by the in situ method (Pin vitro DaisyII method can be used for estimating some protein degradability parameters such as parameter c, PD and ED but not for others (a, b and lag time). In addition, the ability of DaisyII method to estimate some parameters was better for some feeds (soybean meal, canola meal and corn grain) than for others (barley grain, alfalfa hay and corn silage).

نویسندگان

H. Abdi benemar

Department of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

A. Sobhani senjabod

Department of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • AFRC. 1992. Estimation of protein degradability: A standard method for ...
  • AFRC. 1993. Agricultural and Food Research Council: Energy and protein requirements ...
  • AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edition. Association of ...
  • Aufrère, J., Graviou, D., Demarquilly, C., Vérité, R., Michalet-Doreau, B., ...
  • Belanche,A., Weisbjerg, M.R., Allison, G.G., Newbold,C.J. Moorby, J.M., 2014. Measurement of rumen dry ...
  • Calsamiglia, S., Stern, M.D., Bach, A., 2000. Enzymatic and microbial-cell ...
  • Chen, X.B., 1995. Fitcurve macro, IFRU, The Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen, ...
  • Holden, L.A., 1999. Comparison of methods of in vitro dry ...
  • Hvelplund, T., Weisbjerg, M.R., 2000. In situ techniques for the ...
  • Karlsson, L., Hetta, M., Udén, P., Martinsson, K., 2009. New ...
  • Krizsan, S.J., Jančík, F., Ramin, M., Huhtanen, P., 2013. Comparison ...
  • Madsen, J., Hvelplund, T., 1994. Prediction of in situ protein ...
  • McDonald, I., 1981. A revised model for the estimation of ...
  • NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th revised edition. ...
  • Orskov, E.R., Deb Hovell, F.D., Mould, F., 1980. The use ...
  • Orskov, E.R., McDonald, I., 1979. The estimation of protein degradability ...
  • SAS Institute. 2003. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Release 9.1. SAS ...
  • Stensig, T., Weisbjerg, M.R., Hvelplund, T., 1997. Evaluation of different ...
  • Stern, M.D., Bach, A., Calsamiglia, S., 1997. Alternative techniques for ...
  • Susmel, P., Mills, C.R., Colitti, M., Stefanon, B., 1993. In ...
  • Tamminga, S., Van Vuuren, A.M., Van der Koelen, C.J., Ketelaar, ...
  • Terramoccia, S., Puppo, S., Rizzi, L., Martillotti, F., 1992. Comparison ...
  • Tilley, J.M.A., Terry, R.A., 1963. A two-stage technique for the ...
  • Trujillo, A.I., Marichal, M.de J., Carriquiry, M., 2010. Comparison of ...
  • Van Amburgh, M.E., Collao-Saenz, E.A., Higgs, R.J., Ross, D.A., Recktenwald, ...
  • Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for ...
  • Vanzant, E.S., Cochran R.C., Titgemeyer, E.C., 1998. Standardization of in ...
  • Varel, V.H., Kreikemeier, K.K., 1995. Technical Note: Comparison of in ...
  • Wilkerson, V.A., Klopfenstein, T.J., Stroup, W.W., 1995. A collaborative study ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع