Use of a Digital Protractor and a Spirit Level to Determine the Intraoperative Anteversion of Femoral Component during Cemented Hip Hemiarthroplasty: a Prospective Clinical Trial

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 279

متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TABO-7-4_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 تیر 1398

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Femoral stem anteversion during hip arthroplasty is generally estimated by eye intraoperatively and hasproven to be different from targeted values. This study aims to determine the accuracy of a novel technique using adigital protractor and a spirit level to improve surgeons’ estimation of stem anteversion.Methods: A prospective non-randomized study was conducted among 93 patients with femoral neck fracture whounderwent cemented hemiarthroplasty via posterolateral approach. In the control group (N=62), five experiencedsurgeons assessed stem anteversion related to the posterior femoral condylar plane using visual estimation with atarget angle of 15°-25°. In the study group (N=31), another two surgeons assessed stem anteversion with the sametarget angle by placing a digital protractor on the femoral stem inserter handle while the assistant held the leg in the trulyvertical position, verified by a spirit level that was attached to the shin with cable ties. Stem anteversion was measuredblind, postoperatively, on 2D-CT and compared with the intraoperative results.Results: The mean postoperative anteversion was 22.4° (-4.2° to 51.3°, SD 11.1°) in the control group and 23.0° (16.0°to 29.9°, SD 3.6°) in the study group (P=0.810). The study group had more stems positioned in 15°-25° anteversion(71.0% vs 32.3%, P=0.001) and the mean absolute value of surgeon error was -0.2° (-5.4° to 7.0°, SD 3.0°). Twentyeightstems of the study group (90.3%) had an error within 5°. Surgeon overestimation > 5° was found in 1 hip (3.2%)and underestimation > 5° was found in 2 hips (6.4%).Conclusion: Using a digital protractor and a spirit level was reliable with high accuracy and precision to improve theintraoperative estimation of cemented stem anteversion.Level of evidence: II

نویسندگان

Anuwat Pongkunakorn

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lampang Hospital and Medical Educational Center, Mueang District, Lampang, Thailand

Patanapong Palawong

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lampang Hospital and Medical Educational Center, Mueang District, Lampang, Thailand

Swist Chatmaitri

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lampang Hospital and Medical Educational Center, Mueang District, Lampang, Thailand

Nawakun Phetpangnga

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lampang Hospital and Medical Educational Center, Mueang District, Lampang, Thailand