Psychological empowerment, Meritocracy and competent management; Missing Rings of Governmental Organizations in Afghanistan

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 493

فایل این مقاله در 15 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

OICONFERENCE02_185

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 بهمن 1395

چکیده مقاله:

In the third millennium and in the current turbulent world of business; the organizations are trying to attract and keep the most qualified managers as one of their competitive advantages. Qualification considered as a set of features that contribute to job performance and achieve organizational goals. The qualifications include knowledge, skills, abilities, and some correspondent features such as Values, motivation, innovation and self-controlled. Today, developed human resources considered as the main factor of organizations competitive advantage and this can be achieved through well-managed human resources by scientific and reasonable methods and benefit from their power and thought in organization competitive goals. Meritocracy starts with desire for qualification in an organization, evolves by finding and breeding qualified people and continues with meritocracy. Among the factors that have been influential in developing the role of human resource management; rapid changes and being complicated conditions can be named. The success of organizations in providing social objectives and responsibilities depends on managers and their performance to a large extent. In this context, the present article examined several factors as missing rings of most of Afghanistan governmental organizations. First, the author investigated psychological empowerment, meritocracy and competent management, as the rings which their application lead to management improvement and country administrative and management modification in the context of theoretical foundations. Since psychological empowerment and meritocracy system theoretically and systematically have been considered a new trends inside the country, and of course because of lack of resources and internal research in this field, the author tried to combine discussions on the principles of meritocracy and determine the most applicable principles in management for local organizations

نویسندگان

Fariborz Rahimnia

Professor Department of Management at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Ali Reza Zare

graduate student in business administration at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Klitgaard, R. E. (1986). Elitism and meritocracy in developing countries: ...
  • Kellough, J. E., & Selden, S. C. (1997). Pay- for- ...
  • Mir Kamali, SM (1997). Principal job training and organizational development. ...
  • Mohammadi, A. (2002). Empowering staff. Journal of Management Studies. Mirsepassi, ...
  • Nadi, MA, K., Stari (2004). Infrastructure management and policy in ...
  • Ryan, M. Richard & Edward L. Deci (2000); "Self- Determination ...
  • Shelton, Samuel Terrance (2002); Employee, Supervisors and Empowerment in The ...
  • Spreitzer, Gretchen M. (1995); "Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, ...
  • Soltani, I. (2004). Mechanisms o establish meritocracy in agencies and ...
  • Tan, K. P. (2008). Meritocracy and elitism in a global ...
  • Thomas, Kenneth W. & Betty A. Velthouse (1990); "Cognitive Elements ...
  • Torkzadeh, J. (1997). Meritocracy in the selection of managers, management ...
  • Uitermark, J. (2004). The co-optation of squatters in Amsterdam and ...
  • Whetten, David A. & kim S. Cameron (1998); Developing Management ...
  • Zarei, H. (2000). Meritocracy management. Cooperatives, No. 113. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع