Isa Abedini - Lecturer in farhngyan University (Pardis Allameh of Tabriz) and Education zone
Hossein Rahimirad - Post graduate student of social psychology, educational assistant,Lecturer in farhngyan University,Iran
Ahmad Fatemi Hafdaran - Bachelor of Social Science Research
Mohammad Mustafa Abdi - Bachelor of Social Science Research

Proponents of symbolic interaction theory argue that practically, all human interactions depend on exchange of symbols. When we are in interaction with others, we are constantly looking for clues for suitable behaviors in different fields and the way to interpret others intentions. Symbolic interaction draws our attention to details of interaction among people and how the details are used to understand what others say and do. In the present article, to clarify the meaning of Shahriar’s heidar Baba, we used symbolic interaction, Habermas communicative action, Gadamer and Heidegger's philosophical approach, Gadamer’s dialectical understanding, de-familiarization in Russian Formalism, Leucine Goldman’s significant structure and Habermas’s reproduction of the world. Methodology was hermeneutics and interpretation. The purpose of hermeneutic is achieving mutual understanding rooted in social action that will be realized in the context of common meanings, motives, intentions and inter-subjective beliefs. Marx, Freud and Habermas’s main concern is human liberation from distortions and each of them search these distortions in specific phenomena. Marx sees it in labor or rather human activity and accordingly states the alienation of man. Freud believes that through language and in the process of dialogue , these distorted factors rooted in the unconscious can be recognized. But Habermas defines relationship as the best factor of de-distortion from the human personality. The paper according to sociological analysis investigates various aspects of Shahryar’s Hydrbaba.

Hermeneutics, meaning structure of Shariar’s Heydar Baba, dialectical understanding, meaningful structure