A Comparison Between the Effectiveness of E-learning and Blended Learning in Industrial Training

سال انتشار: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 228

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_MEDIA-11-1_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 فروردین 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Blended learning has recently become a widespread practice in industrial training. Accordingly, comparing the effectiveness of e-learning and blended learning in industrial environments is of utmost necessity. The purpose of this research was to compare the effectiveness of e-learning and blended learning in industrial training based on learning outcomes and course satisfaction. Methods: This study was conducted at Hepco Company in 2018, and a quasi-experimental design with a control group was used. The sample size included 90 employees randomized in three groups by means of random sampling method. 60 participants were assigned to the experimental groups (30 learners in e-learning group and 30 in blended learning group) and 30 of them went to the control group. Satisfaction questionnaire (Kirkpatrick, 2007) with 23 questions and 3 components was used for data collection. Components of this scale included the content component (8 questions), lecture component (9 questions) and organization-possibilities (6 questions). The reliability of the questionnaire was 0.92 based on the Cronbach’s alpha. To evaluate the learning outcomes a researcher made test with 30 questions was administered, and the CVR of the test for validity was 0.96. Results: In terms of learning outcomes, the mean results in the blended learning group (M=22.96, SD=2.66) were higher than in the e-learning (M=19.48, SD=3.25) and face-to-face (M=18.13, SD=4.62) groups. There was a significant difference between of learning scores in the experimental group and control group (p <0.001). Also the results showed that the mean course satisfaction in blended learning group (M=71.19, SD=8.6) was higher than e-learning (M=43.88, SD=7.94) and face-to-face (M=59.65, SD=11.63) groups. The course satisfaction scores showed that the blended learning group expressed greater satisfaction than the e-learning and face-to-face groups (p <0.001). Conclusion: The results indicate that blended learning can improve the effectiveness of training. It is therefore suggested that curriculum developers and HR managers in companies can improve industrial training by developing blended learning courses.

کلیدواژه ها:

E- Learning ، Workplace Learning ، Blended Learning ، Vocational Education & Training

نویسندگان

Sirus Mansoori

Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak, Iran

Ziaaldin Salari Koohfini

Department of Curriculum Development, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

Manizheh Ghasemali

Department of Educational Psychology, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Pratt, R.J (2002). The Manager's Role in Creating a Blended ...
  • Payne, A.M., J.E. Stephenson, J.E., Morris, W.B., Tempest, H.G., Mileham, ...
  • Kumar, K. L., (2002). Science and technology courses via e-Learning: ...
  • Pratt, R.J; Pellowe, C.R; Shelley, J; Adams, J; Loveday, H.P; ...
  • Yoon. W.S & lim. D.H, (2007): strategic blending: A conceptual ...
  • David, O; salleh. M and Iahad. N (2012)The impact of ...
  • Mohammadi M, Marzooghi R, Salimi Gh, Mansoori S.(2017) Learners’  Experiences ...
  • Mohammadi M, Marzooghi R, Salimi Gh, Mansoori S. The effect ...
  • Duhaney, C. D. (2004). Blended learning in education, training, and ...
  • Zenger. &Uehlei.C. (2001). Why blended will win. Journal of Training ...
  • Abu Rahman, MD; Han, S.l (2013)Belended learning in TVET for ...
  • Pastore, R., (2002). E-learning in Education: An overview. Proceedings of ...
  • Franks, P., (2002). Blended learning: What is it? How does ...
  • Mosalanejad,l(2010). Presentation of a blended learning Program and its Psychological ...
  • Motamedi, A; Barghi Irani, Z & Karimi, B (2012) Comparison ...
  • Bailey, K. D., & Morais, D. B. (2005). Exploring the ...
  • Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended Learning ...
  • Pereira, J. A., Pleguezuelos, E., Meri, A., Molina‐Ros, A., Molina‐Tomás, ...
  • Akkoyunlu, B., & Yilmaz-Soylu, M. (2008). A Study of Student's ...
  • Şahin, M. (2010). Blended learning in vocational education: An experimental ...
  • Shelton, B. E., & Parlin, M. A. (2016). Teaching Math ...
  • Mwanza-Simwami, D. (2016). Fostering Collaborative Learning with Mobile Web 2.0 ...
  • Garavan, T.N. & O’Donnell, D. (2003). E Learning in Irish ...
  • Kanuka, H., Brooks, C., & Saranchuck, N. (2009). Flexible learning ...
  • McSporran, M. & King, C. (2005) Blended Is Better: Choosing ...
  • Graham, C.R (2006). Blended learning systems: definition, current trends and ...
  • Cottrell. D. M & robisson. R. A (2003) Blended learning ...
  • Seung-Won, Y., & Lim, D. H. (2007). Strategic blending: A ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع