The Impact of Raters’ and Test Takers’ Gender on Oral Proficiency Assessment: A Case of Multifaceted Rasch Analysis

سال انتشار: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 181

فایل این مقاله در 32 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-36-3_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

The application of Multifaceted Rasch Measurement (MFRM) in rating test takers’ oral language proficiency has been investigated in some previous studies (e.g., Winke, Gass, & Myford, ۲۰۱۲). However, little research so far has ever documented the effect of test takers’ genders on their oral performances and few studies have investigated the relationship between the impact of raters’ gender on the awarded scores to male and female test takers. Thus, this study aimed to address the above-mentioned issue. Twenty English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers rated the oral performances of ۳۰۰ test takers. The outcomes demonstrated that test takers’ gender differences did not have any significant role in their performance differences when they were rated by the raters of the same or opposite gender. The findings also reiterated that raters of different genders did not demonstrate bias in rating test takers of the opposite or same gender. Moreover, no significant difference was observed regarding male and female raters’ biases towards the rating scale categories. The outcomes of the study showed that both male and female raters assign fairly similar scores to test takers. This suggests no evidence based on which either male or female raters must be excluded from the rating process. The findings imply that there is no need to worry about the impact of gender for a more valid and reliable assessment.

کلیدواژه ها:

bias ، multifaceted Rasch measurement (MFRM) ، rating scale ، severity

نویسندگان

Houman Bijani

Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch

Mona Khabiri

Assistant Professor Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmadi, A., & Sadeghi, E. (2016). Assessing English language learners’ ...
  • Aryadoust, V. (2016). Gender and academic major bias in peer ...
  • Attali, Y. (2016). A comparison of newly-trained and experienced raters ...
  • Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge: ...
  • Baleghizadeh, S., & Gordani, Y. (2012). Core units of spoken ...
  • Barkaoui, K. (2011). Think-aloud protocols in research on essay rating: ...
  • Barrett, S. (2001). The impact of training on rater variability. ...
  • Brown, A. (2005). Interviewer variability in oral proficiency interviews. Frankfurt: ...
  • Buckingham, A. (1997). Oral language testing: do the age, status ...
  • Caban, H. L. (2003). Rater group bias in speaking assessment ...
  • Cumming, A. (1990). Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language ...
  • Davis, L. (2016). The influence of training and experience on ...
  • Eckes, T. (2005). Examining rater effects in TestDaF writing and ...
  • Eckes, T. (2015). Introduction to many-facet Rasch measurement. Frankfurt: Peter ...
  • ETS (2001). ETS Oral Proficiency Testing Manual. Princeton, NJ.: Educational ...
  • Fall, T., Adair-Hauck, B., & Glisan, E. (2007). Assessing students’ ...
  • Fulcher, G., Davidson, F., & Kamp, J. (2011). Effective rating ...
  • Hughes, R. (2011). Teaching and researching speaking (2nd ed.). London: ...
  • Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences ...
  • In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2016). Task and rater effects ...
  • Lim, G. S. (2011). The development and maintenance of rating ...
  • Linacre, J. M. (1989). Many-faceted Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA ...
  • Lumley, T., & O’Sullivan, B. (2005). The effect of test-taker ...
  • Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Maria-Ducasse, A., & Brown, A. (2009). Assessing paired oral Raters’ ...
  • McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman. ...
  • McNamara, T. F., & Lumley, T. (1997). The effect of ...
  • Myford, C. M. & Wolfe, E. W. (2004). Detecting and ...
  • Nakatsuhara, F. (2011). Effect of test-taker characteristics and the number ...
  • O’Loughlin, K. (2002). The impact of gender in oral proficiency ...
  • O’Sullivan, B. (2000). Exploring gender and oral proficiency interview performance. ...
  • O’Sullivan, B. (2002). Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair ...
  • Porter, D. (1991). Affective factors in the assessment of oral ...
  • Porter, D., & Shen, S. (1991). Sex, status and style ...
  • Sawaki, Y. (2007). Construct validation of analytic rating scales in ...
  • Schaefer, E. (2008). Rater bias patterns in an EFL writing ...
  • Sunderland, J. (1995). Gender and language testing. Language Testing Update, ...
  • Van Moere, A. (2012). A psycholinguistics approach to oral language ...
  • Winke, P., Gass, S., & Myford, C. (2012). Raters’ L2 ...
  • Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square ...
  • Xi, X, & Mollaun, P. (2011). Using raters from India ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع