Thematization: A Contrastive Study of Persuasive Texts Written by Native and Nonnative Columnists

سال انتشار: 1391
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 347

متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

RTETL01_058

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 آذر 1395

چکیده مقاله:

Thematization is considered the mental act or process of selecting particular topics as themes in discourse or words as themes in sentences. This paper examines thematization strategies in Englishopinion articles written by American and Iranian journalists. To this end, 2 of the leading newspapersin the United States and Iran, The New York Times and Tehran Times, have been chosen. Based on the qualitative and quantitative analysis of textual features and marked and unmarked themes of 12 opinion articles (6 from each newspaper), this study aims to find out how these 2 groups ofprofessional writers organize their themes, into marked and unmarked ones and what effects these organizations have on the audiences. The findings revealed that textual features were present in both sets of data. The occurrences of marked and unmarked themes were not significantly different. However, it was found that the American writers used marked themes more frequently than the Iranian writers.

نویسندگان

Tooba Mardani

Department of Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, Iran