Effects of the Vaughan Method in Comparison with the Audiolingual Method and the Communicative Language Teaching on Iranian Advanced EFL Learners’ Speaking Skill

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 394

فایل این مقاله در 13 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ARHP02_016

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 تیر 1398

چکیده مقاله:

The present study intended to examine the effectiveness of the Vaughan method for the development of EFL learners’ speaking skill. The Vaughan method was compared with two other methods, namely the Audiolingual method and communicative language teaching with regard to the development of learners’ speaking skill. In a quasi-experimental design, three intact classes of 90 advanced Iranian EFL learners were given a speaking pretest. Subsequently, the learners were taught with these three methods, and the learners were administered a speaking posttest. A one-way ANOVA was run which indicated that indicated that there were significant differences among the performance of three classes. A posthoc Scheffe test showed that the learners in the Vaughan class had performed significantly higher in comparison to the learners in the Audiolingual class, but there was no significant difference between the Vaughan method and the communicative language teaching class in terms of developing the learners’ speaking skill. Additionally, a questionnaire was administered to the Vaughan class to obtain learners’ attitudes towards the effectiveness of this method for the development of their speaking skill. Finally, the learners in the Vaughan class were interviewed. The results of both the questionnaire and the interview indicated that the learners believed that explicit error correction, as a major tenet of the Vaughan method, had a significant influence on their speaking skill. Meanwhile, the learners reported that translation, as another tenet of the Vaughan method, was effective for their speaking skill, and that they were more motivated by the teacher’s proper feedback on their grammar and vocabulary errors.

نویسندگان

Mehdi Bagheri

Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran,

Bahram Hadian

Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Mehdi Vaez-Dalili

Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran