Structural equation modeling of consequences of organizational anomie

سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 52

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJNAA-14-11_011

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 3 دی 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Anomie can be called the phenomenon of the modern era because modernization causes damage to the previous value structure, and as a result, the modern man is somehow in confusion and identity crisis. This study has been conducted with the aim of modeling the explanatory structural equations of factors affecting the consequences of organizational anomie. About ۱۲ experts' opinions have been used to model the explanatory structural equations of factors affecting the consequences of organizational anomie. In this research, to identify the criteria and express the relationships between the criteria, after studying the related research literature and interviewing the experts under study, the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) technique and MICMAC analysis were used. After the data analysis, the variables were classified into four different levels and according to the ISM, graph relationships were drawn. After MICMAC analysis, the variables were placed in three groups of independent or key variables, autonomous and dependent. The variables of "nepotism and discrimination" and "technological turbulence" are more influenced by other factors and from a systemic point of view, they are considered among the effective and dependent elements (the second group) that have a weak influence, but despite this, they have a higher dependence force than It has other factors. Also, the variables "managers' lack of commitment to the organization's values" and "lack of a suitable evaluation system" are among the key variables, which are included in the category of independent variables (fourth group) and have a great impact on the realization and meta-analysis of the factors affecting the consequences of organizational anomie. , which has a high influence and low dependency. Determining the relationships between factors can lead to a better understanding of the issue and making appropriate decisions in identifying the factors affecting the consequences of organizational anomie.

نویسندگان

Mohammad Reza Rahimi Zarchi

Department of Management, Rafsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rafsanjan, Iran

Malikeh Beheshtifar

Department of Management, Rafsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rafsanjan, Iran

Hossein Kazemi

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Y. Abazari, Bazar society, in the report of the social ...
  • A. Ali Akbari and M. Akbari, Structural-interpretive modeling of factors ...
  • F. Emrai, S.N. Mousavi, R. Sepahvand and A.H. Nazarpuri, Sociological ...
  • M. Eskandari, A. Eslami Farsani, A. Kargar and M.R. Hadi ...
  • M. Golparvar and M. Nadi, Organizational abnormality in relation to ...
  • N. Hatam, V. Keshtkaran and P. Nabiei, The relationship between ...
  • A. Jabehdar and H. Bejani, The role of motivation reduction ...
  • H. Javadi, M. Elmi and S. Sabbagh, Investigating effective social ...
  • P. Johnson and J. Duberley, Anomie and culture management: Reappraising ...
  • M. Karami and A. Edrisi, Social components affecting the occurrence ...
  • M. Kosari, Theories of social anomie, Tehran, Salman publications, ۲۰۱۷ ...
  • S.H. Marjaei, Students’ compliance with professional norms in academic research: ...
  • N. Mazloumi and S. Sefidchian, Investigation the role of change ...
  • S.N. Mousavi, A. Shariatnejad and M. Arefnejad, Identifying and prioritizing ...
  • H. Nayebi, S. Moayed Far, S.H. Serajzadeh and I. Faizi, ...
  • F. Ramezani, D. Modi and M. Keshtidar, The relationship between ...
  • M.R. Ramezanian, M. Moradi and F. Soltani, Analysis of obstacles ...
  • N. Sefidchian, H. Mazloumi and J. Salehi Sadaghiani, A model ...
  • R. Sepahvand, M. Arefnejad, F. Zare and M. Sepahvand, The ...
  • L. Vilca, R. Gonzales, V. Pariona-Millan, T. Caycho-Rodrıguez and M. ...
  • J.N. Warfield, An Interim Look at Uses of Interpretive Structural ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع