Prevalence of Different Types of Crown Restorations after Root Canal Treatment of Posterior Teeth in Kerman, Iran

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 163

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JKMU-23-4_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 دی 1401

چکیده مقاله:

Background & Aims: Crown restoration of teeth after root canal treatment protects their remaining structure against breakage and infection of the root canal, and will replace the missing structure. This study was performed to identify the prevalence of different types of crown restorations after root canal treatment of posterior teeth in Kerman, Iran, in ۲۰۱۳. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on ۴۱۰ individuals (۱۰۴۷ endodontically treated teeth) in ۳ radiology centers in Kerman. To collect data, the existence of an endodontically treated posterior tooth was evaluated through panoramic radiography, and patients’ demographic information (including sex, age, education level, and their dentist’s education level) were obtained. The endodontically treated posterior teeth were not entered into this study if they did not have suitable restorations, had lost the tooth crown due to extensive caries, were not preservable, or were bridge abatements. Crown restorations were recorded based on their types, crown, amalgam, and composite with or without cusp coverage, and being a molar or premolar tooth. Data were analyzed in SPSS software using chi-square test. All P-values of less than ۰.۰۵ were considered significant. Results: In the present study, ۲۰۳ (۴۹.۵%) men and ۲۰۷ (۵۰.۵%) women participated. The mean age of subjects was ۳۶.۸۴ ± ۹.۷۶ years. Among the ۱۰۴۷ studied teeth, ۳۸۰ (۳۶.۳%) were premolar teeth and ۶۶۷ (۶۳.۷%) were molar teeth, and ۳۱۶ teeth (۳۰.۲۰%) had a full crown. There was a statistically significant difference between existence of crown treatment, and educational level and age of patients. Amalgam and composite restoration had a statistically significant difference in terms of patients’ sex; amalgam restoration was more common in men, while composite restorations were more common in women. Crown treatment was more common in the specialists group, while amalgam restoration without cusp coverage was more common in the general dentists group. Conclusion: The results showed that amalgam or composite crown restorations without cusp coverage are common, which illustrates the necessity of emphasizing the importance of crown restorations in long term survival of root treated teeth in dentistry colleges.

نویسندگان

Sina Safari

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Masoud Parirokh

Professor, Department of Endodontic, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Hedayat Gorjestani

Endodontist, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Iman Ghahraman

Dentist, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Molouk Torabi

Associate Professor, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks ...
  • Stavropoulou AF, Koidis PT. A systematic review of single crowns ...
  • Shillingburg HT, Sather DA. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. ۴th ed. ...
  • Berman LH, Hargreaves KM, Cohen SR. Cohen's pathways of the ...
  • Salehrabi R, Rotstein I. Endodontic treatment outcomes in a large ...
  • Nagasiri R, Chitmongkolsuk S. Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars ...
  • Lazarski MP, Walker WA, Flores CM, Schindler WG, Hargreaves KM. ...
  • Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the ...
  • Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth ...
  • Shelley PQ, Johnson BR, BeGole EA. Use of an Electronic ...
  • Briggs PF, Scott BJ. Evidence-based dentistry: endodontic failurehow should it ...
  • Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting ...
  • Cheung GS. Endodontic failureschanging the approach. Int Dent J ۱۹۹۶; ...
  • Weiger R, Axmann-Krcmar D, Lost C. Prognosis of conventional root ...
  • Linn J, Messer HH. Effect of restorative procedures on the ...
  • Mondelli RF, Barbosa WF, Mondelli J, Franco EB, Carvalho RM. ...
  • Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع