The Effect of Explicit Pragmatic Instruction on EFL Students' Production of Speech Acts: Pragmalinguistic vs. Sociopragmatic Errors in Focus

سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 112

فایل این مقاله در 17 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ELT-15-31_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 31 تیر 1402

چکیده مقاله:

L۲ learners' pragmatic development could be manifested by their proper speech act production. Due to the existing differences among languages, errors in speech act realization are inevitable. Employing well-established teaching methods could help L۲ learners overcome their problems in speech act production. This endeavor aimed to explore the effects of explicit metapragmatic instruction on Iraqi EFL learners' use of English requests, apologies, and refusals examining the possible intervening role of error type and gender. The study sample comprised ۸۰ English major B.A. students at Al-Kufa University, Iraq. Within six online sessions, the EG received instruction through direct awareness raising and being provided with metapragmatic information. Data analyses indicated that explicit pragmatic instruction significantly improved the students' speech act realization. Additionally, while the female learners benefitted more from the intervention and a higher percentage of sociopragmatic, compared to pragmalinguistic, errors were amended after the treatment, the variables of gender and pragmatic error types did not have significant intervening effects. The findings imply that developing pragmatic competence via direct pragmatic intervention and metapragmatic knowledge awareness needs to receive much attention on the part of Iraqi language instructors, materials developers, and curriculum designers, as it could greatly help learners avoid pragmatic failures.

نویسندگان

Mahmoud Afrouz

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Alyaa Alkawaz

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Daryush Nejadansari

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Azizollah Dabaghi

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages,University of ‎Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Abdel-Jawad, H. (۲۰۰۰). A linguistic and sociopragmatic and cultural study ...
  • Abu-Humeid, A. M. A. A. (۲۰۱۳). The effect of gender ...
  • Ahmadian, M. J. (۲۰۲۰). Explicit and implicit instruction of refusal ...
  • Alfghe, A., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (۲۰۲۱). Realization of the speech ...
  • Al-Issa, A. (۱۹۹۸). Sociopragmatic transfer in the performance of refusals ...
  • Al-Jumah, K. A. J. (۲۰۲۱). Utilizing concept-based instruction in teaching pragmatics: ...
  • Bachman, L. F. (۱۹۹۰). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford ...
  • Bataineh, R. & Bataineh, R. (۲۰۰۵). Apology Strategies of Jordanian ...
  • Beebe, L.M., Takahashi, T. and Uliss-Weltz, R. (۱۹۹۰). Pragmatics Transfer ...
  • Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (۱۹۸۴). Requests and apologies: A ...
  • Bu, J. (۲۰۱۲). A study of the effects of explicit ...
  • Derakhshan, A., & Arabmofrad, A. (۲۰۱۸). The impact of instruction ...
  • Derakhshan, A., & Eslami, Z. (۲۰۱۵). The Effect of Consciousness-Raising ...
  • Farahian, M., Rezaee, M., & Gholami, A. (۲۰۱۲). Does direct ...
  • Gharibeh, S. G., Mirzaee, M., & Yaghoubi-Notash, M. (۲۰۱۶). The ...
  • Halenko, N., & Jones, C. (۲۰۱۱). Teaching pragmatic awareness of ...
  • Harooni, M., & Pourdana, N. (۲۰۱۷). Politeness and indirect request ...
  • Hussein, T. M. (۲۰۱۸). Strategies of refusal in American English ...
  • Kakolaki, L. N., & Shahrokhi, M. (۲۰۱۶). Gender differences in ...
  • Kasper, G., & Roever, C. (۲۰۰۵). Pragmatics in second language ...
  • Kasper, G., Schmidt, R., (۱۹۹۶). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. ...
  • Lihui, Z., & Jianbin, H. (۲۰۱۰). A study of Chinese ...
  • Littlewood, W. (۲۰۱۳). Developing a context-sensitive pedagogy for communication-oriented language ...
  • Liu, J. (۲۰۰۴). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of Chinese EFL learners (Doctoral ...
  • Maeshiba, N., Yoshinaga, N., Kasper, G., & Ross, S. (۱۹۹۶). ...
  • Merriam-Webster. (n. d.). Go, go out, go away, get out, ...
  • Mohammed, M. M. (۲۰۱۲). Teach ability of Pragmatic Competence: The ...
  • Muhammed, H. (۲۰۰۶). The Influence of Some Social Variables on ...
  • Nelson, G., Carson, J., Al Batal, M., & El Bakary, ...
  • Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. (۱۹۸۳). Apology: A speech act ...
  • Omar, F. R., & Razi, O. (۲۰۲۲). Impact of Instruction ...
  • Rajabi, S., Azizifar, A., & Gowhary, H. (۲۰۱۵a). The effect ...
  • Rajabi, S., Azizifar, A., & Gowhary, H. (۲۰۱۵b). Investigating the ...
  • Safont-Jorda`, M. P. (۲۰۰۴). An analysis on EAP learners' pragmatic ...
  • Sattar, H. Q. A., Lah, S. C., & Suleiman, R. ...
  • Shams, R., & Afghari, A. (۲۰۱۱). Effects of Culture and ...
  • Spolsky, B. (۱۹۹۸). Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press ...
  • Stevens, P. B. (۱۹۹۳). The pragmatics of "No!": Some strategies ...
  • Taguchi, N. (۲۰۱۵). "Contextually" speaking: A survey of pragmatic learning ...
  • Tajeddin, Z., & Tayebipour, F. (۲۰۱۵). Interface between L۲ learners' ...
  • Thomas, J. (۱۹۸۳). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, ۴, ۹۱-۱۱۲ ...
  • Trosborg, A. (۱۹۹۵). Statutes and contracts: An analysis of legal ...
  • Turki, H. Y., Juma’a, Q. H., & Al-Kubaisy, A. A. ...
  • Valipour, S., & Jadidi, S. (۲۰۱۵). Study of Iranian English ...
  • Yusuf, N. H. (۲۰۱۸). Causes of Pragmalinguistic Errors in University ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع