Comparison of ۳-port with standard ۴-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A clinical trial

سال انتشار: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 47

فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JSTR-8-2_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 5 دی 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: Since the laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced first in ۱۹۹۰, the ۴-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was the gold standard. The ۴-port (lateral) is used to hold gallbladder fundus and observe Calot's triangle. It is discussed that the ۴-port technique is not required in many patients. Therefore, this study aimed to make a comparison between ۳-port and ۴-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy methods in the treatment of gallstone disease. Methods: A double-blind clinical trial was performed on patients admitted to Imam Reza Hospital, Birjand, Iran. The patients with gallstone disease (n=۶۰) were randomly assigned into the case (۳-port) and control (۴-port) groups using balanced block randomization and underwent ۳- or ۴-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative pain was measured by a visual analog scale four h after surgery. The amount of pain-killer, duration of surgery, as well as length of stay and scars were measured in this study. Data were analyzed statistically in SPSS software (version ۱۸) through the Chi-square test and t-test. A p-value less than ۰.۰۵ was considered statistically significant. Results: The groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics. There were ۲۴ females (۸۰%) and ۶ males (۲۰%) in the control group and ۲۵ females (۸۳.۴%) and ۵ males (۱۶.۷%) in the case group (P=۰.۷۳۹). Moreover, the mean ages of the control and case groups were ۵۹.۸۲۳±۷.۸ and ۶۱.۱۰±۴.۷, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the groups in this regard (P=۰.۳۴۸). Furthermore, length of operation (P=۰.۰۰۱) and analgesic consumption (P=۰.۰۰۱) in the ۳-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group were lower than those in the ۴-port group; however, the hospital stay (P=۰.۸۹۶) was the same in both groups. Conclusions: The ۳-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe, reliable, and cost-effective method in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Seyyed Amir kazem Vejdan

MD, Associate Professor in General Surgery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

Malihe Khosravi

MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

Zahra Amirian

Department of General Surgery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

Masoumeh Noorimoghddam

Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Festi D, Dormi A, Capodicasa S, Staniscia T, Attili AF, ...
  • Gadacz TR, Talamini MA, Maryland B. Traditional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ...
  • Al-Azawi D, Houssein N, Rayis AB, McMahon D, Hehir DJ. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع