Dosimetry of Occupational Radiation around Panoramic X-ray Apparatus

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 64

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JBPE-9-5_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 دی 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Panoramic imaging is one of the most common imaging methods in dentistry. Regarding the side-effects of ionizing radiation, it is necessary to survey different aspects and details of panoramic imaging. In this study, we compared the absorbed x-ray dose around two panoramic x-ray units: PM ۲۰۰۲ CC Proline (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) and Cranex Tome (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland).Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, ۱۵ thermoluminescet dosemeters (TLD-۱۰۰) were placed in ۳ semi-circles of ۴۰cm, ۸۰cm and ۱۲۰cm radii in order to estimate x-ray dose. Around each unit, the number of TLDs in each semi-circle was ۵ with equal intervals. The center of semicircles accords with the patient’s position. Each TLD was exposed ۴۰ times. These dosemeters were read out with a Harshaw Model ۴۰۰۰ TLD Reader (USA). The calibration processing and the reading of dosemeters were performed by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.Results: The mean absorbed dose in three lines of PM ۲۰۰۲ CC Proline was ۱۲۳.۲±۱۵.۱, ۱۱۸.۰±۱۱.۰ and ۱۰۸.۰±۹.۱ µSv, (p=۰.۰۱۳). The results were ۱۴۰.۴±۱۵.۲, ۱۲۰.۲±۱۰.۴ and ۱۱۱.۶±۱۱.۲ µSv in Cranex Tome (p=۰.۲۰۸), which reveals no significant difference between two systems.Conclusion: There are no significant differences between the mean absorbed dose of surveyed models in panoramic imaging by two units (PM ۲۰۰۲ CC Proline and Cranex Tome). These results were less than occupational exposure recommended by ICRP, even at the highest calculated doses.

نویسندگان

A H Pakravan

MD, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran

S M R Aghamiri

PhD, Department of Radiation Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

T Bamdadian

MD, Department of Prosthesis, Faculty of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran

M Gholami

PhD, Obesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular–Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

M Moshfeghi

MD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Lurie GA. Panoramic imaging. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. Louis: ...
  • Piedra I. The Levandoski Panoramic Analysis in the diagnosis of ...
  • Mattila M, Kononen M, Mattila K. Vertical asymmetry of the ...
  • Osman F, Scully C, Dowell TB, Davies RM. Use of ...
  • Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. Aspects of panoramic radiography ...
  • Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN. Radiographic equipment and techniques ...
  • Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Debaveye D, Verlinden S, ...
  • Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Debaveye D, Bogaerts R, Verlinden S, ...
  • American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of ...
  • Wingren G, Hallquist A, Hardell L. Diagnostic X-ray exposure and ...
  • Wingren G, Hatschek T, Axelson O. Determinants of papillary cancer ...
  • Arndt D, Lenz U, Konig W. Fatal skin epithelioma in ...
  • Foley SJ, Pay A, Howell GP, Holt S. Metastatic squamous ...
  • Jacobs R, Vanderstappen M, Bogaerts R, Gijbels F. Attitude of ...
  • Mettler FA, Jr., Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective ...
  • White, S.C. and M.J. Pharoah, Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. ...
  • Commission EU. Radiation Protection ۱۳۶. European Guidelines on radiation protection ...
  • Gavala S, Donta C, Tsiklakis K, Boziari A, Kamenopoulou V, ...
  • Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices ...
  • Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, ...
  • Zielinski JM, Garner MJ, Krewski D, Ashmore JP, Band PR, ...
  • In: International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication ۶۰: ۱۹۹۰ ...
  • Kim IH, Mupparapu M. Dental radiographic guidelines: a review. Quintessence ...
  • Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to ...
  • Yasuda H, Takami M, Ishidoya T. Changes in optical transmission ...
  • Hayakawa Y, Kobayashi N, Kuroyanagi K, Nishizawa K. Paediatric absorbed ...
  • Vallo J, Suominen-Taipale L, Huumonen S, Soikkonen K, Norblad A. ...
  • Devlin H, Yuan J. Object position and image magnification in ...
  • Nair MK, Nair UP. Imaging of mandibular trauma: ROC analysis. ...
  • Persson RE, Hollender LG, Powell VL, MacEntee M, Wyatt CC, ...
  • Drozdzowska B, Pluskiewicz W, Tarnawska B. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in ...
  • Cho BH. Diagnostic performance of dental students in identifying mandibular ...
  • Tierris CE, Yakoumakis EN, Bramis GN, Georgiou E. Dose area ...
  • Nilsson L, Rohlin M, Thapper K. Exposure distribution, absorbed doses, ...
  • Martin C. Effective dose: how should it be applied to ...
  • Kuroyanagi K, Hayakawa Y, Fujimori H, Sugiyama T. Distribution of ...
  • Bankvall G, Hakansson HA. Radiation-absorbed doses and energy imparted from ...
  • Frederiksen N. Specialized radiographic techniques. Oral radiology; Principles and interpretation, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع