The Timing of Feedback and Learners’ Age on Implicit and Explicit Grammar Learning

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 482

فایل این مقاله در 20 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RELT-7-1_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 خرداد 1398

چکیده مقاله:

This study explored the effect of timing of feedback (i.e., immediate vs. delayed) and learners’ age (adolescent vs. adult) on the development of English regular past tense structure. Two intermediate classes of adolescent and adult learners were selected as the participants. Participants were asked to carry out two narrative tasks which set the context for the provision of corrective feedback. The selected target structure was the regular past tense –ed feature. The untimed grammaticality judgment test was used to measure explicit knowledge development and elicited imitation test was employed for the measurement of implicit learning. These tests were administered at the beginning of the study as pre-test, immediately after the provision of immediate feedback and again immediately after the provision of delayed corrective feedback. The results demonstrated that whereas both adolescent and adult learners improved their implicit knowledge after the delayed feedback, explicit knowledge was improved in adult learners after both immediate and delayed feedback but in delayed feedback in adolescent learners. The implications of the findings are discussed in light of theories of second language acquisition.

نویسندگان

Leila Ahmadpour

Department of English, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran

Hassan Asadollahfam

Department of English, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Boukan, Iran

Sahar Ahmadpour

Department of English, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Akakura, M. (2012).Evaluating the effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit ...
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998).Inside the black box: Raising ...
  • Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to ...
  • Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010).Student revision with peer and ...
  • DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning.In M. Long & ...
  • Diab, N. M. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does ...
  • Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998).Communicative focus on form. In ...
  • Doughty, C., &Williams, J. (1998).Focus on form in classroom second ...
  • Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ...
  • Fiestas, C., & Peña, E. (2004). Narrative discourse in bilingual ...
  • Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2013).A formative assessment system for ...
  • Garza, C. L. (1990). Family pictures: Cuadros de familia. San ...
  • Goldstein, L. M. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written ...
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007).The power of feedback. Review ...
  • Heaton, J. B. (1975). Beginning composition through pictures. London: Longman ...
  • Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006).Feedback on second language students’ ...
  • Khezrlou, S. (2012).The relationship between cognitive and metacognitive strategies, age ...
  • Khezrlou, S. (2018). Form-focused instruction in CALL: What do learners ...
  • Khezrlou, S., Ellis, R., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Effects of ...
  • Kiany, Gh., Mirhosseini, S. A., & Navidinia, H. (2011). Foreign ...
  • Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language ...
  • Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use: The ...
  • Lemley, D. U. (2005). Delayed versus immediate feedback in an ...
  • Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: ...
  • Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2016).The effects of ...
  • Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. ...
  • Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. ...
  • Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: ...
  • Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom ...
  • Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2010).Feedback to writing, ...
  • Peterson, S. S., & Portier, C. (2014). Grade one peer ...
  • Pienemann, M. (2012). Processability theory and teachability. Wiley: The Encyclopedia ...
  • Quinn, P. (2014). Delayed versus immediate corrective feedback on orally ...
  • Rahimi, A., & Dastjerdi, H. V. (2012). Impact of immediate ...
  • Rolin-Ianziti, J. (2010). The organization of delayed second language correction. ...
  • Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective ...
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language ...
  • Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial ...
  • Schmidt, R. (2001). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review ...
  • Shintani, N., & Aubrey, S. (2016). The effectiveness of synchronous ...
  • Varnosfadrani, A. D. (2006). A comparison of the effects of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع